post #1 of 1
Thread Starter 

Sometimes I forget that the world is full of people who take things out of context.  And it is a tragic statement when one of ABC's senior national correspondent is filling the world with this much (false, poorly reported) garbage.  Here's a great post from David Roberts of Grist:




So Jake Tapper -- the very model of the modern gossip-obsessed campaign reporter -- goes to see a Bill Clinton speech and returns to write a blog post: "Bill: 'We Just Have to Slow Down Our Economy' to Fight Global Warming."


Ha! Finally the dirty liberals admit it! They want to destroy the economy!


The post ended up on Drudge, from whence it made the usual rounds of the dingbatosphere.

Only Tapper was full of sh**.


As the Clinton campaign rushed to point out, Tapper yanked the quote out of context -- a context in which Bill Clinton was making exactly the opposite point. Here's what Clinton said:



And maybe America, and Europe, and Japan, and Canada -- the rich counties -- would say, 'OK, we just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions 'cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.' We could do that.

But if we did that, you know as well as I do, China and India and Indonesia and Vietnam and Mexico and Brazil and the Ukraine, and all the other countries will never agree to stay poor to save the planet for our grandchildren.

The only way we can do this is if we get back in the world's fight against global warming and prove it is good economics that we will create more jobs to build a sustainable economy that saves the planet for our children and grandchildren. It is the only way it will work.

So Tapper egregiously misrepresented Bill Clinton's point, making it into the opposite of what he said. (Incidentally, this is a point Clinton's made many, many times before.) You couldn't ask for more clear evidence of journalistic malpractice.


(Read the rest from David Roberts at Gristmill, January 31, 2008)

Edited by stins - Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:07:34 GMT