Totally, she gives the only answer she can -- a rote, robotic one! She admits in her answer to the first question that she's only been involved at a local level. Oy vey.
Related Forum Threads
- Thoughts on the VP debate? Last post on 10/4/08 at 9:54am in Environmental News and Politics
- ELECTION DAY! Last post on 11/5/08 at 3:47pm in Environmental News and Politics
- Thoughts on the second presidential debate? Last post on 10/14/08 at 3:20pm in Environmental News and Politics
- One debate down... Last post on 9/27/08 at 7:10pm in Environmental News and Politics
- CleanCoal takes over Obama, McCain & FoxNews.com Last post on 9/29/08 at 9:34am in Environmental News and Politics
2008 Vice President Nominee Environmental Records
Last edited: 10/27/08
- John Mccain For President In 2008Last edited: 3/26/08
- Barack Obama For President In 2008Last edited: 1/17/11
- Joe Biden For President In 2008Last edited: 3/14/08
- Green Blogs And JournalsLast edited: 8/15/09
These are great LED replacements for halogens or fluorescents. I had a mix of CFLs and halogens around the house that i've been wanting to replace with low energy LEDs for some time and I've now...
Goes on smooth and easily, doesn't smear too much throughout the day. The color is great and the product is natural. I'd definitely buy it again!
I'm not a big drinker, and I'm even less of a vodka drinker. That said, this vodka is quite smooth and mixed well into a variety of cocktails. If I'm going to drink vodka, I definitely prefer...
Great product, saves a lot of water. You definitely have to use some elbow grease though.
It's one of my favorites!
What are your opinions of the respective VP picks? - Page 2post #31 of 469/25/08 at 7:17pmpost #32 of 469/27/08 at 7:17pmpost #33 of 469/27/08 at 8:26pmQuote:Originally Posted by kiwi:
I felt sorry for her in that interview. She was so obviously in over her head.
The thing is, she always seems in over her head. I just watched the interview that Dana linked to above... and it was truly painful.
In contrast, watching the debates last night, I felt McCain did a solid job. He was forceful, direct, and largely answered the questions that were posed to him. Barrack, for the most part, did too.
I really hope that the media can get the Republicans to let Palin out of her cage. It's obvious why they don't want to, but I really hope they'll be forced to.post #34 of 469/28/08 at 9:32amThread Starter
As for the Russia flying into Alaska - it's just a total joke. She's arguing that her foreign policy experience is entirely hypothetical. If Russia were completely stupid and forgot the Cold War were over, then they'd fly over Alaska. OMG! It's just amazing that Palin/McCain won't drop this stupid 'Alaska is close to Russia...and Canada!' ruse. People just aren't that stupid.
Palin is proving to be a really stupid choice for VP. Every time she has an interview she comes off looking waaaaay out of her league. So the McCain campaign tries to keep her away from the media, but that's not doing her any favors when it comes to the debate next week.
Plus after the presidential debate, Biden was interviewed on every major network. Palin was nowhere to be found, McCain's camp instead represented by his campaign manager. She can't even handle talking to the press about how the presidential debate went! That's the easiest job ever - all you have to do is babble about McCain's experience.
I really can't wait until Thursday. I just hope Biden doesn't come off as condescending or too harsh and make people feel sorry for Palin. That's pretty much her only chance.post #35 of 469/28/08 at 2:57pmpost #36 of 469/28/08 at 3:09pmThread Starter
Or that asking her any hard questions is sexist behavior. Which is bizarre, because it's okay to ask Hillary tough questions, but not Palin. Nice double-standard.
Palin scares me. She may have attempted to ban books in Wasilla, she was blessed against witchcraft by a pastor who had persecuted a woman he proclaimed to be a witch in Kenya, a pastor and blessing who she credits for playing a big role in her becoming governor, she signed a budget which made women pay for their own rape kits and medical exams in Wasilla - but she never has to answer questions about this stuff. She's frightening. For all we know she's a complete nutjob, but because she avoids the media, there's no way to know! And because she's a woman, she can get away with avoiding the media by playing the sexism card.post #37 of 469/29/08 at 11:44am
so I didn't read through all the replies yet, but wanted to respond.
I really feel like palin was choosen in an attempt to garner the female vote. I nolonger feel that McCain is a viable option to me, because I can not risk voting for him and if something happens having Palin end up president. I was researching her just the other day and just could not support her as president. On the flip side, where I was conserned about Obama's inexperience, I feel that Biden does balance that out a little more now. I like Biden and am happy with most of his political views and past choices.
I also had a second when I was deciding all this were I said isn't that strange. I'm not voting for who will be president really, I'm voting for who will be vp. but I guess that's just how things are working out for me this election.post #38 of 469/29/08 at 12:01pmThread Starter
I agree - this year the VP picks are more important than usual. The main criticism of Obama is that he's too inexperienced, so it was important for him too choose a VP who could help advise him. He did that. One main concern about McCain is his age and health. There's a significant chance he could die in office, so it was important for him to pick a VP who would be ready to take his place. Clearly he did not do that.
Further, the choices reveal a lot about the candidates' judgement. Obama made a wise choice. McCain made a rash, risky choice. Since then, he's made a series of other similarly rash choices (i.e. suspending his campaign to address the bailout - except he didn't actually suspend anything).
So it's not just the VP nominees themselves, but also what their choice tells you about the presidential candidates. That McCain was willing to put politics over country is enough in itself to make me question whether I could vote for him.post #39 of 469/30/08 at 7:09pmpost #40 of 469/30/08 at 7:44pmThread Starterpost #41 of 469/30/08 at 8:50pm
I couldn't agree more. I think she is in way over her head, and it too caught up in the 'liberal earmarking elite are what is wrong with this country' rhetoric to realise it. That and I just don't agree with any of her polices. ;)
But I don't think experience alone is enough to rule someone out. I've heard many an argument that some of the best Presidents were relatively inexperienced, and that some of the worst were incredibly experienced.post #42 of 4610/1/08 at 10:36am
GIBSON: And you didn't say to yourself, "Am I experienced enough? Am I ready? Do I know enough about international affairs? Do I -- will I feel comfortable enough on the national stage to do this?"
PALIN: I didn't hesitate, no.
(from an interview with Charlie Gibson)
"I didn't hesitate, no?" Really, Palin? Because if I was a first term governor of one of the smallest states in the US (by population), I would hesitate, as sure as I breathe. Honestly, how could someone in good conscience take on that position when she is so clearly (as so many of you have said) in over her head? How could you even dream that that would be good for the country?
Or take this clip for example....
She can't even list by name any of the magazines or newspapers she reads....oofff...now that's in over your head.post #43 of 4610/1/08 at 10:43am
Just one more thing...
Couric: What's your position on global warming? Do you believe it's man-made or not?
Palin: Well, we're the only Arctic state, of course, Alaska. So we feel the impacts more than any other state, up there with the changes in climates. And certainly, it is apparent. We have erosion issues. And we have melting sea ice, of course. So, what I've done up there is form a sub-cabinet to focus solely on climate change. Understanding that it is real. And …
Couric: Is it man-made, though in your view?
Palin: You know there are - there are man's activities that can be contributed to the issues that we're dealing with now, these impacts. I'm not going to solely blame all of man's activities on changes in climate. Because the world's weather patterns are cyclical. And over history we have seen change there. But kind of doesn't matter at this point, as we debate what caused it. The point is: it's real; we need to do something about it.
Uh huh....post #44 of 4610/1/08 at 11:16amThread Starter
Well, I certainly hope Palin did hesitate in reality, but as a politician she's just putting up the front that 'oh no of course I didn't hesitate because I'm just so damn prepared to be VP'. It's one of those answers where you have to say no, because if you say yes, it gets people thinking 'well if she's not even sure she's ready to be VP, then maybe she's not'. It would be nice if politicians could be honest about that sort of thing.
As for the magazines/newspapers - that's definitely sketchy. Her answer was basically 'oh I just read so many of them...', but come on. I read a lot of newspapers, but I could name at half dozen of the top of my head too. How can you not name any? And why not name a few even if you don't really read them? She was probably scared that she'd be judged by what she reads (for example, if she cited the NY Times [liberal] or Washington Times [conservative]). My guess is that her lack of response here was due to her history of screwing up answers in the few interviews she's done. The less you say, the less you can screw up. Once again we go back to the fact that she never offers details in any of her answers, and the few times she tries to go beyond her talking points, she says something stupid.
As for global warming, that's a bunch of malarkey. She changed her position because it went against McCain's position and it's a politically untenable stance. And if we're not causing global warming, there's nothing we can do about it!post #45 of 4610/1/08 at 6:23pmpost #46 of 4610/1/08 at 10:18pmThread Starter
- John Mccain For President In 2008
- › Who has the most recycling responsibilty - consumers or Starbucks? 1 day, 13 hours ago
- › California motorcycle driving test = killer! 3 days, 11 hours ago
- › Future of Earth's Fresh Water 4 days, 20 hours ago
- › Future of Earth's Fresh Water 5 days, 12 hours ago
- › E-Twow electric kick scooter 5 days, 22 hours ago
- › Make your place spotless with Eco-friendly services. 1 week ago
- › Environmental satire 1 week, 2 days ago
- › Homemade Non-toxic home air fresheners? 1 week, 4 days ago
- › Are solar panels efficient in winter? 1 week, 5 days ago
- › testing again! 1 week, 5 days ago
- › Tuwago B3-12DPRO 12-watt BR30 Flood LED Lamp by paul518
- › Mineral Fusion Natural Brands Eye Pencil, Coal, 0.04 Ounce by smallone
- › Ed Phillips & Sons Co. Prairie Organic Vodka by stins
- › Lucky Earth Waterless Car Wash by stins
- › Method Dish Soap by stins
- › Seventh Generation Natural Toilet Bowl Cleaner by stins
- › Fiber Element Bamboo sheet set by tw6852
- › Brush with Bamboo - Ecological Bamboo Toothbrush Family Pack by jtangerine
- › Coeconut 100% Organic Vegan Lip Balm by coeconut
- › Method bloq body lotion by cybergrannie
- › Organic 4th of July Cocktails
- › Tips on Grocery Shopping
- › Making Your Breakfast Organic
- › Eco-Friendly Car Washing
- › Guide to Method Home Products
- › Best All Purpose Cleaners
- › Best Natural Bathroom Cleaners
- › Thinking Outside the Rooftop
- › The Role of Politics in the Planning of Wind...
- › How to distinguish poor quality LED light and...