Green Options › Forums › Anything but Green › Featured Debates › Obama Officially Opens Offshore Areas in U.S. for Oil Drilling - Good Idea or No?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Obama Officially Opens Offshore Areas in U.S. for Oil Drilling - Good Idea or No?

post #1 of 5
Thread Starter 
Officials, on Tuesday, announced a not too surprising move - Obama is lifting a many decades ban on oil and gas drilling along quite a large chunk of the U.S. Atlantic coast and northern Alaska. The move, set to be announced at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, is supposedly part of an effort to reduce the U.S. dependence on foreign imports and secondly is being implemented in order to perhaps win support for an energy and climate bill.
obama offshore drilling.jpg

Of course this is a move that's expected to be debated by environmentalists and supported by many long-time pro-drilling advocates.

Quote:
"Drilling alone cannot come close to meeting our long-term energy needs, and ... for the sake of the planet and our energy independence, we need to begin the transition to cleaner fuels now," Obama said in prepared remarks.

The "Cannot come close" quote above is somewhat of an understatement. According to the New York Times, there may be only a "three-year supply of recoverable oil and more than two years’ worth of natural gas, at current rates of consumption. But those estimates are based on seismic data that is, in some cases, more than 30 years old."

Some of the no drill debates going on...
  • This will cause too much eco-damage for too little reward.
  • This won't get folks on board with climate bills. Obama is just jumping through hoops.
  • Coastal Atlantic will suffer from tourism drops, among other things.
  • This doesn't exactly address our real issue - the need for drastic long-term reduction in energy consumption. (although, note Obama is also announcing alternative fuel gov vehicles, which some feel is only to placate environmentalists). 

Some of the pro drilling debates....
  • We shouldn't fuss since we already use oil from other places. If you drive quite complaining.
  • This shows that Obama is a middle road kind of guy - which we should appreciate.
  • The drilling is being well managed so it shouldn't cause much planet-based damage.

Learn more:

New York Times
NPR
What do you think? Great idea or not so much?
post #2 of 5
Well it's something that was going to have to happen in order to get enough support for a climate and energy bill to pass.  What I'm confused about is why they opened up the offshore areas now instead of including their opening in the bill.  Maybe President Obama felt like giving the concession beforehand would be something of a sign of good faith towards Republicans, but it seems to me like it gives them that much less incentive to vote for the bill if the offshore areas have already been opened.

I just hope Obama knows what he's doing.  It seems like he may be falling into the same bipartisan trap as with health care.  If it was me I would have put it in the climate bill and said 'if you want to open up these offshore areas for drilling, you'd better vote for the bill'.  Like I said, I hope he knows what he's doing.
post #3 of 5
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dana1981 View Post

Well it's something that was going to have to happen in order to get enough support for a climate and energy bill to pass.  What I'm confused about is why they opened up the offshore areas now instead of including their opening in the bill.  Maybe President Obama felt like giving the concession beforehand would be something of a sign of good faith towards Republicans, but it seems to me like it gives them that much less incentive to vote for the bill if the offshore areas have already been opened.
 

I think that no official drilling will likely take place for years though - or so I read somewhere. However, even if this move does not get people on board to vote for climate and energy bill I'm guessing the stance on drilling won't change. So yeah, a clause might have been smart, although you can't (I suppose) have some sort of "You must vote" law in place - that would never work. A deal might have been smarter. If he's going to give up land for drilling it should be in exact exchange for something.
post #4 of 5
Time will tell.  Many people underestimated Bush (mainly his electability).  People seem to be doing the same with Obama.  Mostly folks seem to project what they want to believe on him rather than understanding his approach and goals.  Here's one take on it.
post #5 of 5
This issue has turned into eco pandering from the left and waste-excusing from the right. The independents offer no better option. (unless Amory Lovins decided to run for office, which he won't, and assuming he is an independent, which isn't required for him to run.)

One side is only concerned with the sky falling, the other concerned with being forced to get up to change the channel without a remote.

If there is no fee-bate attached to drilling, there will be no point to drilling except to make a handfull of people rich while blowing the rainy day fund. Fee-bates reward the good thing (the purchase of the energy saver) and penalize the bad thing (the drilling).

So they get to drill, but they pay extra for the privilege. The money pays for those of us who buy the energy saver.

Imagine a floor of $3 a gallon for gas. Have that floor rise in 50 cent increments for 2 years until it's $4 and hold it there for a while. Have a flexible gas tax that fluctuates above the market price that brings the price paid up to the floor. Put the money into renewables and efficiency and transit. That's it. Not "carbon neutrals" or other inadvertantly pro-nuclear eco pandering.

Can the public be educated about the FINANCIAL advantages of fee-bate energy saving/drilling? Or will "our side" keep pandering to the eco sensitivity of every single energy issue on the planet while the other side hands them the remote?

Will society keep catering to the lures of laziness and consumerism and resulting financial waste by NOT addressing these issues? Or confront them and risk not being re-elected and being de-friended on facebook?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Featured Debates
Green Options › Forums › Anything but Green › Featured Debates › Obama Officially Opens Offshore Areas in U.S. for Oil Drilling - Good Idea or No?