Time Magazine has a good piece up - The Case for Global Warming Stronger Than Ever - which yes, like it sounds, covers the long ongoing debate between climate scientists and global warming believers vs. folks who plain don't believe along with the uncertainty of data.
According to the article, "Scientists haven't done a good enough job of communicating how they distinguish human versus natural influences." But one answer may lie in climate models; computer simulations that project climate effects in various scenarios, including those in which humans do not emit any greenhouses at all. According to the models, greenhouse gases that humans are generating are a problem. Not a shock.
According to the article, "Scientists haven't done a good enough job of communicating how they distinguish human versus natural influences." But one answer may lie in climate models; computer simulations that project climate effects in various scenarios, including those in which humans do not emit any greenhouses at all. According to the models, greenhouse gases that humans are generating are a problem. Not a shock.







