Green Options › Forums › Sustainable Living Discussions › Other Green Stuff & Green Services › True or False? BIG Green Choices Are All That Matter
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

True or False? BIG Green Choices Are All That Matter

post #1 of 5
Thread Starter 
I was looking for some info on paper towels the other day, and happened upon a Grist post about hand dryers vs. paper towels that noted the following...

Quote:
The impact of how you dry your hands is so small that you'd be far better off spending your time and energy on more important issues, and those where the environmental payoff is clearer -- such as converting the lighting in all those public restrooms to energy-efficient light fixtures (or convincing the powers that be to do the converting).

Now, I'm a huge Grist fan, but this remark has been bugging me all day. If we applied this thinking to everything we do, we may end up doing far less green acts as a result. In my opinion, smaller green choices DO make a difference because...

  • More people are willing to get on board with small green habits but not everyone is going to, or able to do something where the eco-payoff is larger and more clear - i.e. buying a hybrid, putting up solar panels, etc.
  • Small green acts do cumulatively add up. If everyone only bought recycled paper or everyone biked at least three times a week or choose to buy an energy efficient light bulb or two it would add up to a whole lot of people contributing to a greener planet.
  • When people already invested in green living spout off about big huge green acts it scares people off who aren't already on board with green living; in my experience.
  • Also in my experience, people who partake of small green living skills tend to span out their skill sets and become more green over time - it's like green stepping stones.

Personally, I get that the whole hand dryer vs. paper towel issue might be a moot point, it might very well make almost no difference to one single person, but if all we did was focus on the big stuff we might get overwhelmed - I know I would. I make small choices everyday and that Grist comment just sort of peeved me.

What do you think? Agree or not? We should focus our energy on bigger green issues or all of them no matter how small? 
post #2 of 5
I agree.  This ties in to the thread about living with a "non-green" significant other.  Going from first-hand experience I had much more luck agreeing and compromising with my wife on small things.  Like most people she was comfortable with her life and fought against any large disruptions.  Of course many of us feel that, unless big things are done, we're in very big trouble.  That aside, though, different approaches are necessary to get different people on board. 
Demanding a lot and marginalizing anything less than that will, in my opinion, have detrimental effects.  Recognizing small steps and encouraging them (while not necessarily settling) is a good approach for many people.
post #3 of 5
For big wigs it is fun to talk 'mega' scale but far less to talk practical scale. On greenbiz.com the is an article by the Serious Materials CEO, Kevin Surace - actually his address to the house Democratic caucus. İt is all about mega scale - if congress will just fill the trucks with money and dump it where he says the USA will be so much better off for it.

Surace is a Silicone Valley venture capital guy. He bought Republic Windows in Chicago which was occupied by laid off workers and is now pushing their windows very hard. He did a wonderful job of patting himself on the back for buying a bankrupt company at bargain prices! The way he explained you would have thought he bought the company to help the workers.

He goes on to provide information on their windows claiming they have a unique technology. İn looking at their specs İ don't see anything different than many others do - use of dual or triple pane, use of argon or krypton gas fill, synthetic material frames and the necessary components to put things together. He talked about how dual pane glass is old technology and then presented nothing new.

His presentation was a lot of wow and not much (if any) substance. Fits right in with congress! The fellow writing the Grist article would have appreciated Surace's talk.
 
Small steps but continuing steps reach the destination - remember the tortoise and the hare.

David JC MacKay in his publication 'Sustainable Energy - without the hot air' discusses the grand statements many make. He also notes that saving 'vampire power' accomplishes little on the scale of things - but he states 'that does not mean we shouldn't do it'.
 
post #4 of 5
On Planet Forward there is a writer saying the same thing - that you have to get Washington to do it for you.

The idea that if you can shift the blame, especially to the government, then sit back doing nothing and pat yourself on the back is a bit crazy. 
post #5 of 5
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by captaint View Post

Demanding a lot and marginalizing anything less than that will, in my opinion, have detrimental effects.  Recognizing small steps and encouraging them (while not necessarily settling) is a good approach for many people.

Exactly! At my green blogs I get some seriously tiny (to me) green questions but if I sat there and said, "Why would you ask such a silly question" it would totally turn people off and make them feel bad. I try to answer everyone or come up with solutions no matter how small the issue. I like Grist, but I think that comment has the potential to turn a lot of people off.

Many small steps are as useful IMO as one big one. We can't all make grand gestures all of the time.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Green Options › Forums › Sustainable Living Discussions › Other Green Stuff & Green Services › True or False? BIG Green Choices Are All That Matter