Green Options › Forums › Sustainable Living Discussions › Transportation › Ford opts for liquid coal concept
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ford opts for liquid coal concept

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 

A little "news" piece from Clayton B. Cornell over at Gas 2.0:


Ford Motor company announced today it would be offering a new range of alternative-fuel vehicles by early 2010, powered by what some think is the US’s only hope for energy independence: coal.

 

Ford says that it will be converting the massive amount of empty storage space found on their larger trucks into mobile coal-storage and processing containers:

 

 

“We’ve done some serious research on coal—since it will be the 21st century’s predominant fuel—and we’ve come up with some interesting results. For example, in extensive polling, we found that American’s don’t really care which fuel they use, as long as it’s cheap. Coal is by far the cheapest source of domestic energy we’ve got. Second, we also found that 98% of the bed space in our large trucks goes unused about 100% of the time. So, we just put two and two together.”

 

The company estimates that an F-350 could haul about 1,000 lbs of coal without any noticeable sag. Raw coal (yeah, the black blocky-looking stuff) will be fed into the bed of the truck were it will be processed by an onboard coal gasifier.

 

(To read the whole post, head on over to Gas 2.0)


Edited by stins - Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:40:19 GMT
post #2 of 8

Are you freaking kidding me?  Liquid coal?!  If you've got extra storage space, throw some batteries back there and make it an EV!

 

This kind of idiocy is why the US auto companies are failing.  Unbelievable.

post #3 of 8

That has to be an April fools joke. Seriously. Does it come with a little guy in a trailer that shovels it into the boiler while you drive?

post #4 of 8

Just to clarify why liquid coal is a monumentally stupid idea, here is what the Sierra Club says about it:

 

"Although its proponents claim that liquid coal is a cure-all to our nation's energy problems, the truth is that liquid coal is plagued with economical and environmental downsides from the time coal is mined until long after the liquid is burned. Liquid coal releases almost double the global warming emissions per gallon as regular gasoline, making a hybrid filled with liquid coal as dirty as a Hummer H3 running on regular gas.

 

Liquid coal also requires huge amounts of water, and would lead to an over 40% increase in coal mining just to replace a mere 10% of our nation's transportation fuels. Proponents of liquid coal also want the government to funnel billions in subsidies and tax breaks to artificially create an entirely new industry. Liquid coal is arguably the dirtiest, most expensive energy gamble we could take."

post #5 of 8

Ah yes, perhaps I should read the entire article before responding, hah. Nice work Clayton!

 

I'm gonna put the dunce cap on and sit in the corner.

post #6 of 8

Well geez now I feel dumb.  Thanks stins :-P

post #7 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dana1981:

Well geez now I feel dumb.  Thanks stins :-P

 

Hahaha!

 

Sorry.  Okay...here's the end of Clayton's post.


Environmental groups’ comments weren’t even included since I’m lazy and would have had to write another paragraph.

 

APRIL FOOLS!

 


 

I know.  It's April 2nd.  But we didn't have any April fools pranks on Huddler.  So I thought I'd at least link to someone else's.

 

post #8 of 8

Hahaha! This was damn funny.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Transportation
Green Options › Forums › Sustainable Living Discussions › Transportation › Ford opts for liquid coal concept