Green Options › Forums › Climate Change › Science › Nature article: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Nature article: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 

The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions

 

H. Damon Matthews1, Nathan P. Gillett2, Peter A. Stott3 & Kirsten Zickfeld2

Nature 459, 829-832 (11 June 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature08047

 

Abstract:  The global temperature response to increasing atmospheric CO2 is often quantified by metrics such as equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response1. These approaches, however, do not account for carbon cycle feedbacks and therefore do not fully represent the net response of the Earth system to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Climate–carbon modelling experiments have shown that: (1) the warming per unit CO2 emitted does not depend on the background CO2 concentration2; (2) the total allowable emissions for climate stabilization do not depend on the timing of those emissions3,4,5; and (3) the temperature response to a pulse of CO2 is approximately constant on timescales of decades to centuries3,6,7,8. Here we generalize these results and show that the carbon–climate response (CCR), defined as the ratio of temperature change to cumulative carbon emissions, is approximately independent of both the atmospheric CO2 concentration and its rate of change on these timescales. From observational constraints, we estimate CCR to be in the range 1.0–2.1 °C per trillion tonnes of carbon (Tt C) emitted (5th to 95th percentiles), consistent with twenty-first-century CCR values simulated by climate–carbon models. Uncertainty in land-use CO2 emissions and aerosol forcing, however, means that higher observationally constrained values cannot be excluded. The CCR, when evaluated from climate–carbon models under idealized conditions, represents a simple yet robust metric for comparing models, which aggregates both climate feedbacks and carbon cycle feedbacks. CCR is also likely to be a useful concept for climate change mitigation and policy; by combining the uncertainties associated with climate sensitivity, carbon sinks and climate–carbon feedbacks into a single quantity, the CCR allows CO2-induced global mean temperature change to be inferred directly from cumulative carbon emissions.

post #2 of 4

Hmm 1-2°C per trillion tons carbon.  I found this chart of global CO2 emissions:

 

 

Carbon being about 27% the weight of CO2, basically divide by 4 to get global carbon emissions.  So it's roughly 6 billion tons of carbon emitted annually on average for about 40 years, or around 250 billion tons emitted so far.  So based on that, the planet should have warmed just 0.25-0.5°C?  And if we continue the 6 billion tons per year carbon emissions, we won't warm another 1-2°C for over 150 years?

 

Both numbers are too low.  Is it perhaps 1-2°C per trillion tons CO2 rather than carbon?

post #3 of 4

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcnp58 View Post

the warming per unit CO2 emitted does not depend on the background CO2 concentration

 

What? Of course it does, band saturation. Or do they mean something else by this? 

post #4 of 4

RealClimate had a post covering a couple of similar recent articles.

 

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/04/hit-the-brakes-hard/langswitch_lang/po

 

I don't think it's disputing the concept of climate sensitivity and forcing being a factor of atmospheric concentrations.  It's saying that expected warming can be simplified by looking at total CO2 emitted - useful for policy considerations.  That's my take on it.

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Science
Green Options › Forums › Climate Change › Science › Nature article: The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions